ArcGIS REST Services Directory
JSON

ELC_trca (FeatureServer)

View In:   Map Viewer

Service Description: Polygon layer displaying Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) ecological land classification (ELC) data. TRCA's Terrestrial Monitoring and Inventory Group utilizes a variety of data collection methods in order to gain an understanding of the natural system at different scales. The methods have been chosen to complement each other and provide a more complete picture of all the components of the natural system; this provides the information basis for further data analysis and interpretation that will eventually assist land planning decisions and action. ELC is collected on an annual basis in various locations by biologists.

Service ItemId: 0054dd639acd49e4bf349c7576b9c62f

Has Versioned Data: false

Max Record Count: 2000

Supported query Formats: JSON

Supports applyEdits with GlobalIds: False

Supports Shared Templates: False

All Layers and Tables

Layers:

Description:

The standard data collection protocol for TRCA since 2001 has been based on parts of the Ecological Land Classification System, or ELC, for Southern Ontario, developed by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (Lee et al., 1998). The ELC method classifies the landscape using an organizational framework of a nested hierarchy of scale. The broadest scale is the ELC Community Class (e.g. Forest), and the most detailed is Vegetation Type (e.g. dry-fresh sugar maple forest). A full ELC survey to the level of vegetation type is a very detailed and time-consuming process. The TRCA protocol for surveying vegetation communities strikes a balance between giving enough detail to provide meaningful descriptions of vegetation communities and the constraints of time and funding. For example, resources are unlikely to be available to pursue detailed soil analysis (as outlined in the ELC field guide) in every patch surveyed in the TRCA jurisdiction, especially in the baseline phase. A code from the ELC system is assigned to each polygon. For reference, a list of communities with their codes, scores, and descriptions is carried into the field by the surveyor. Additional vegetation types described by the TRCA since 2000 that are not found in the ELC field guide are included in this reference list.

ELC Attribute Table - Summary

Field Name

Description

CPYDENSITY

Canopy Density A measure of how closed or open the canopy cover (tree crown) is within the

community. Estimate based on following cover ranges (<10%, 10-25%, 25-35%, 35-60%, >60%)

CANOPYSP1

Seven character flora code of the most prevalent species within the canopy.

CPYDOM1

Ranking of prevalence for the species identified in CANOPSP1 within the canopy

CANOPYSP2

Seven character flora code of the second most prevalent species within the canopy.

CPYDOM2

Ranking of prevalence the species identified in CANOPYSP2 within the canopy.

CANOPYSP3

Seven character flora code of the third most prevalent species within the canopy.

CPYDOM3

Ranking of prevalence for the species identified in CANOPYSP3 within the canopy.

CANOPYSP4

Seven character flora code of the fourth most prevalent species within the canopy.

CPYDOM4

Ranking of prevalence for the species identified in CANOPYSP4 within the canopy.

MDLDENSITY

Midstory Density A measure of how closed or open the canopy cover (midstory) is within the

community. Estimate based on following cover ranges (<10%, 10-25%, 25-35%, 35-60%, >60%)

MIDDLESP1

Seven character flora code of the most prevalent species within the middle canopy.

MDLDOM1

Ranking of prevalence for the species identified in MIDDLESP1 within the midstory.

MIDDLESP2

Seven character flora code of the second most prevalent species within the midstory.

MDLDOM2

Ranking of prevalence for the species identified in MIDDLESP2 within the midstory.

MIDDLESP3

Seven character flora code of the third most prevalent species within the midstory.

MDLDOM3

Ranking of prevalence for the species identified in MIDDLESP3 within the midstory.

MIDDLESP4

Seven character flora code of the fourth most prevalent species within the middle canopy.

MDLDOM4

Ranking of prevalence for the species identified in MIDDLESP4 within the middle canopy.

LWRDENSITY

Lower (Understory) Density - A measure of how closed or open the canopy cover (understory) is within the community. Estimate based on following cover ranges (<10%, 10-25%, 25-35%, 35-

60%, >60%)

LOWERSP1

Seven character flora code of the most prevalent species within the understory.

LWRDOM1

Ranking of prevalence the species identified in LOWERSP1 within the understory.

LOWERSP2

Seven character flora code of the second most prevalent species within the understory.

LWRDOM2

Ranking of prevalence for the species identified in LOWERSP2 within the understory.

LOWERSP3

Seven character flora code of the third most prevalent species within the understory.

LWRDOM3

Ranking of prevalence for the species identified in LOWERSP3 within the understory.

LOWERSP4

Seven character flora code of the fourth most prevalent species within the understory.

LWRDOM4

Ranking of prevalence for the species identified in LOWERSP3 within the understory.

GNDDENSITY

Ground Layer Density A measure of how closed or open the canopy cover (forest floor) is within the community. Estimate based on following cover ranges (<10%, 10-25%, 25-35%, 35-

60%, >60%)

GROUNDSP1

Seven character flora code of the most prevalent species within the ground level.

GNDDOM1

Ranking of prevalence for the species identified in GROUNDSP1 within the ground level.

GROUNDSP2

Seven character flora code of the second most prevalent species within the ground level.

GNDDOM2

Ranking of prevalence for the species identified in GROUNDSP2 within the ground level.

GROUNDSP3

Seven character flora code of the third most prevalent species within the ground level.

GNDDOM3

Ranking of prevalence for the species identified in GROUNDSP3 within the ground level.

GROUNDSP4

Seven character flora code of the fourth most prevalent species within the ground level.

GNDDOM4

Ranking of prevalence for the species identified in GROUNDSP4 within the ground level.

AGECLASS

Age classification of the ELC community. Derived from successional and chronological age.

SOILS

Soil depth of Organic Horizon (ORG_HOR) if present.

ELCCODE1

4-7 character code describing the ELC community. Complete list of codes and descriptions can

be found in “Ecological Land Classification for Southern Ontario” MNR circa 1998.

COMPLEX1

4-7 character ELC code describing distinct ELC subunit forming interspersed secondary network

within the larger ELC community. If present.

COMP1SP1

Seven character flora code of the most prevalent species within the complex (COMPLEX1)

COMP1SP2

Seven character flora code of the second most prevalent species within the complex

(COMPLEX1)

COMPLEX2

4-7 character ELC code describing distinct ELC subunit existing within the larger ELC community.

If present.

COMP2SP1

Seven character flora code of the most prevalent species within the complex (COMPLEX2)

COMP2SP2

Seven character flora code of the second most prevalent species within the complex

(COMPLEX2)

INCLUSION1

4-7 character ELC code describing distinct ELC subunit too small to map within the larger ELC

community. If present.

INCL1SP1

Seven character flora code of the most prevalent species within the complex (INCLUSION1)

INCL1SP2

Seven character flora code of the second most prevalent species within the complex

(INCLUSION1)

INCLUSION2

4-7 character ELC code describing distinct ELC subunit too small to map within the larger ELC

community. If present.

INCL2SP1

Seven character flora code of the most prevalent species within the complex (INCLUSION2)

INCL2SP2

Seven character flora code of the second most prevalent species within the complex

(INCLUSION2)

LOG_CUT

Mechanical clearing of the canopy, including opening of the forest for landscaping purposes. Light occasional stumps

Moderate fairly open canopy

Severe original community still recognizable buy barely so.

TRAIL_TRMP

This can result from pedestrians, mountain bikes, and/or off-leash dogs. Urban forest patches

with heavy trampling have virtually no ground layer, except scattered exotics such as garlic mustard.

GRAZING

Presence of herbivory from cattle or other livestock.

BROWSING

Presence of herbivory from deer, geese or other non-domesticated fauna.

FLOODING

Presence of periodic or permanent flooding conditions, storm-water flooding including

scouring, flattened and muddy vegetation and silt deposits.

BEAVER_ACT

Presence of beaver activity

TRASH_DMP

Presence of litter, illegal dumping, fire-pits, yard-waste dumped over ravine edges and crude

construction.

FILL_SDMT

Presence of soil removal, dumping of fill or excavation within the community.

EXOTICS

Subjective assessment of the exotic species present in a community, including all layers.

DATE

Date the ELC community was collected/observed.

OBSERVER

Name of biologist who recorded the observation.

COMMENTS

Additional comments

ORG_HOR

Organic horizon depth of organic material present along soil profile (cm)

AHOR_DEPTH

Depth of A Horizon (cm) n

AHOR_TEX

Soil texture of the A Horizon

BHOR_DEPTH

Depth of B Horizon

BHOR_TEX

Soil texture of the B Horizon

DEPTH_MOTT

Depth to mottles

DEPTH_GLEY

Depth to gley

EFFECT_TEX

Effective texture

MOIST_REG

Moisture regime

POLY_NO

Number of the ELC community polygon. Used for reference and internal purposes.

VERNAL_PL

Vernal pool documents the presence or absence of ephemeral ponds.

QAQC_NAME

Name of technician or biologist who conducted the QA/QC process

QAQC_DATE

Date QA/QC is completed

COMPLEX3

4-7 character ELC code describing distinct ELC subunit forming interspersed secondary network

within the larger ELC community.

INCLUSION3

4-7 character ELC code describing distinct ELC subunit too small to map within the larger ELC

community.

NOTES

General comments

INVASIVES

List of invasive species within the community

DISTURBANC

List of disturbances within the community

PICTURE

COMP3SP1

Seven character flora code of the most prevalent species within the complex (COMPLEX3)

COMP3SP2

Seven character flora code of the second most prevalent species within the complex

(COMPLEX3)

ELC_NAME

Common name of the Ecological Land Classification community

SCORE_DATE

Date the LRank was calculated

ELC_LOCAL

ELC Local Concern Score

LOCAL_OCCU

Local Occurrence score. Average of Local Distribution and Area Score

LOCAL_DIST

Local Distribution Score

AREA_SCORE

Area Score

GEO_PHYSIC

Geophysical Score

LRANK

Local Concern Score

SHAPE_LENG

Length of the ELC community perimeter

SHAPE_AREA

Area of the ELC community



Copyright Text: TRCA

Spatial Reference: 26917 (26917)

Initial Extent:
Full Extent:
Units: esriMeters

Child Resources:   Info

Supported Operations:   Query   ConvertFormat   Get Estimates   Create Replica